Skip to content

celebration

Celebrating 10 Years Of BINJ

The Boston Institute for Nonprofit Journalism’s first decade has been an incredible roller-coaster ride, but Chris Faraone, John Loftus, Linda Pinkow, and I look forward to the challenges to come


It’s truly wild that the Boston Institute for Nonprofit Journalism just turned 10 years old. Although ace journalist Chris Faraone conceptualized BINJ and started working on getting it off the ground a few months prior, pulling media business maven John Loftus into his orbit not long after, we usually date the founding of our organization to June 30, 2015. Which is the very day that Chris and John recruited me into the fold … mere hours after Lesley University refused to renew my contract as a communications and business management professor. An act I have always viewed as retaliation for my having helped organize the successful union drive of the core faculty there.

We started BINJ as an investigative journalism incubator. A niche that Chris had correctly identified as one that really needed filling in Massachusetts. And we immediately set to work producing longform enterprise reporting in the public interest—syndicating it for free to all independent community news outlets with budgets of under $2 million per year, as we continue to do.

Chris, John, and I had literally no money upon launch. My partners both continued to work for DigBoston newspaper for the first year plus. And since I had unemployment checks for what turned out to be only five months, it was agreed that I would get a small monthly stipend after we started fundraising, making me BINJ’s first paid staffer. 

We started hitting up everyone we could think of for money right away, getting our first significant grants within a few months from Craigslist founder Craig Newmark (before he established his foundation) and the Reva and David Logan Foundation—both Chris’ connections. The Logan family and their board would continue funding us throughout most of the decade to come and it is fair to say that BINJ would never have survived to become the (relatively) mature nonprofit we are today without their help. For which we are eternally grateful.

The next several years were an incredible whirlwind of activity. Together with over one hundred experienced freelance journalists, a much smaller number of part-time editorial staffers, and close to two hundred interns, BINJ has produced thousands of high-quality news articles and syndicated them to dozens of news outlets around Massachusetts, the nation, and even internationally from time to time—putting hundreds of thousands of dollars into the pockets of a legion of always-struggling reporters as we went.

We have created and run several major projects over the years. Some, like our Manchester Divided newsroom covering the 2016 and 2020 New Hampshire presidential primaries in BINJ’s most independent of independent styles and our Somerville News Garden that experimented with preventing a small city from becoming a “news desert,” have spun off or sunsetted. Others, like the student-driven statewide magazine HorizonMass that has become our main news brand, are still going strong. 

We have run innumerable journalism workshops and trainings, several journalism conferences, and helped educate our reporting interns in three 12-19-student cohorts annually (spring, summer, and fall). 

We have partnered with every kind of news organization under the sun from a consortium of public access TV stations to some of the largest investigative reporting outfits in the world.

We have also created regional and national networks of fellow news outlets that function as grassroots trade associations serving the sector most jeopardized by the several negative trends that are wiping out the news industry—our sector of small independent news organizations “on the ground,” as we say. The Alliance of Nonprofit News Outlets being the best known of them.

Along the way, we recruited our brilliant Development Director Linda Pinkow, who has done a fantastic job of professionalizing our fundraising operation and keeping us going in the extremely difficult market we work in.

Most importantly, we have continued to serve communities around the Bay State and beyond with critical news articles on key issues of the day that they can’t find anywhere else—across several beats that we have made our own: including prisons, government transparency, housing, and opiates.

As so-called AI threatens to wipe out American journalism completely, finishing the downward spiral started by greedy multinational media corporations forty years ago and accelerated by the rise of the Internet, we continue to hold up the banner of the free press against all odds.

Something that has only been possible because of tremendous financial support over the many years, not just from major funders, but from thousands of our readers that have continued to donate to keep BINJ surviving and thriving.

But this column is not a funding pitch, it’s just a brief review of how BINJ started, where we have been, and who is responsible for us still being here. And that’s everyone who has ever worked with us, everyone who has ever donated to us, and everyone who takes time out of their busy lives to read the huge amount of news coverage that we have produced.

As to where we, and our entire trade, are going next, my BINJ colleagues and I are always trying to figure that out. Things look pretty dire to us these days. But what else is new? They’ve been dire for the entire decade of our existence to date, yet we’re still here.

So, for now, I’ll just say that we look forward to the challenges to come and to providing news that you all can use for as long as we possibly can. Onward.


Apparent Horizon—an award-winning political column—is syndicated by the MassWire news service of the Boston Institute for Nonprofit Journalism.

PASSENGERS AT RISK ON GREYHOUND, OTHER BUS LINES

Ex-Greyhound Bus by Omar Omar is licensed under CC BY 2.0. Modified by Jason Pramas.
Ex-Greyhound Bus by Omar Omar is licensed under CC BY 2.0. Modified by Jason Pramas.

 

No way to contact management in the event of driver medical or psychiatric emergency

 

My wife had a meeting in New York City over the weekend, as is sometimes the case, and decided to take a bus back to Boston on Sunday evening. Over our many years together, we have found that buses are generally the best—and certainly most economical—way to get between the two cities. We are aware of the prejudices that many people have against this mode of transportation, but we agree that they are wrong. Yes, buses can be cramped. Yes, you can’t really walk around on a bus once it’s on the road. Yes, there are no snacks or other amenities on board—beyond bathrooms that it’s usually best to avoid using for some obvious reasons.

 

But buses get you from A to B with a minimum of fuss. And in the case of the Boston-NYC route, they usually get you there in four to four and a half hours—depending on traffic. Roughly the same time (when all factors are considered) as taking the train or flying. At a fraction of the price.

 

Which is not to say we have not had many adventures and inconveniences traveling in this fashion. And those inconveniences virtually all happen upon trying to get from NYC to Boston on a Sunday evening. When masses of students return to the Hub after a weekend in the Big Apple. Huge lines at Port Authority are the order of those days, and bus companies press any vehicle that rolls into service to meet the demand. Your ticket may say your bus is leaving at a particular time. But the staff in charge of boarding buses and the dispatchers in charge of getting them out of the labyrinthine structure that is Port Authority play fast and loose with rules and schedules.

 

These days it’s no longer necessary to choose a bus company that stops at NYC’s main bus terminal at all. There are other lower cost options like MegaBus and BoltBus. And the “Chinatown buses” which wink in and out of existence—based as they are on exploiting immigrant labor… with maintenance records so poor that some of their buses have had major issues like literally catching fire while in motion over the years. But my wife and I avoid the cheaper buses on labor grounds and concerns about cost-cutting measures that could affect safety. Although MegaBus and the Greyhound-owned BoltBus apparently do have unionized drivers in the northeast.

 

So most of the time, we stick with ailing bus giant Greyhound. It’s been through multiple bankruptcies and various owners over the decades we’ve used it. But it’s still the most heavily unionized bus line—and union drivers and mechanics are typically far more likely to run a decent service then most nonunion shops. And we feel it’s worth paying an extra $10-20 each way to arrive safely at our destination. While departing from and arriving at (more or less) climate-controlled bus stations. Rather than having to wait outside in whatever weather for buses in NYC as with the cheaper bus lines. Even if we occasionally have a Sunday night trip that lasts hours longer than it should normally take—as it just did last week to my partner Chris Faraone. And even if I once had to help a driver that got lost on a foggy night years before GPS became ubiquitous—guiding him out of downtown Worcester to Boston’s South Station Bus Terminal several hours after we left NYC.

 

Wonky as that latter predicament was, I have only rarely felt unsafe on a Greyhound bus—and usually only for a brief moment or two due to traffic or road conditions outside my driver’s control.

 

But this Sunday, something happened to my wife on a Greyhound bus that severely shook our confidence in the company and left us worried about a problem we had never considered before. One which I think is worth sharing with the general public, Greyhound management, other bus company management, transportation union leadership, and government regulators—weak though they often are in this era of ever-diminishing government oversight of corporations.

 

My wife’s bus left Port Authority Bus Terminal in New York City early at 5:50 pm on a scheduled 6:30 pm departure bound for Boston. We were in touch by text throughout what transpired next. 

 

She had told me that passengers were instructed to board about 20 minutes prior to that early departure time then had to wait for Greyhound to find a driver. A young woman driver was found, and the bus left just after that staffer boarded.

 

As the bus exited Port Authority, the driver announced that passengers should be patient with her because she was from New Orleans and had never driven from NYC to Boston before. The bus proceeded uptown as is generally the case when going to Boston—although Greyhound buses take any of several routes out of the city depending on traffic. 

 

However, my wife stated that the driver started getting confused about where to go fairly quickly. And the bus ended up circling around Harlem and the Upper West Side without proceeding east to bridges that would take it to highways going north. Instead driving west past the City University of New York’s main campus and onto Riverside Drive at one point, and then as far south as 80th and Broadway. At which time the driver started talking to someone on a phone.

 

The bus had been on the road about an hour and a half at that point. The driver made no attempt to communicate with the passengers and let them know what was going on. Or to ask passengers—many of whom, like my wife, know Manhattan and any of various routes to Boston well—for help navigating. Which is much more difficult to do these days anyway because Greyhound drivers now have a door between them and passengers. The easy communication between drivers and passengers of the pre-9/11 and -weekly mass shooting days is now gone. And that’s likely why no passengers—including my wife—tried to engage the driver as things went from bad to worse.

 

So my wife, and other passengers, became concerned early into the journey. And then scared, as the driver ran at least two red lights, drove into two blind alleys and had to back the bus out, and almost hit a van. Punctuated by stopping the bus a few times on busy streets in evident attempts to figure out where to go on her own.

 

Finally, the person on the phone gave the driver correct directions to the Madison Ave Bridge and thence to Routes 87, 278, and 95. After which the trip proceeded as normal, and arrived about an hour late.

 

While the incident was going on, I posted a note about my concern with the threat to the safety of my wife, passengers, other vehicles and pedestrians to my personal Twitter account—and then shared it to my newspaper’s account—notifying both the @GreyhoundBus and @GHoundBusHelp accounts in the process. Help desk people on both accounts ultimately just told me to have my wife call Greyhound’s regular customer service lines. 

 

Fortunately, my wife and her fellow passengers got home safely. It seems like her inexperienced driver started driving erratically after getting lost in uptown Manhattan, and then got some kind of assistance from another driver or a dispatcher. She apparently had GPS, as one would expect in this day and age. But it either wasn’t working properly or she was in no state to make proper use of it to get her bus out of the city and on the road to Boston.

 

All of which leads me to my main reason for writing this column: While Greyhound has taken steps to protect drivers from attacks by dangerous passengers by placing doors next to the driver’s seat on its buses, what can passengers do if a driver has a medical or psychiatric emergency that puts them in danger? 

 

All communication channels that passengers like my wife could avail themselves of during Sunday evening’s incident seem to lead to Greyhound’s main customer service phone lines. And upon contacting said lines, my wife and other passengers’ concerns for their safety were not addressed in any way by Greyhound customer service representatives. They were simply told to call back in 24 hours and maybe get a credit or a refund or nothing at all, one supposes. Although the reps did confirm that their drivers have GPS and that the company had a tracker on each bus—and, critically, that they couldn’t talk to my wife’s bus’s driver while the bus was en route.

 

It was a situation that wasn’t quite bad enough to call the police to interdict the bus, but could have become one after it was too late to affect the outcome. A situation when a call from company management to tell the driver to stop the bus where she was and let the passengers off while they sent another bus and driver to relieve her of duty could have stopped things from escalating to a tragic conclusion where people on or off the bus could end up being hurt or killed.

 

I asked Greyhound media relations spokesperson Crystal Booker to comment on the record on these matters in time for my deadline, and she told me that Greyhound management might not be able to complete an investigation of the incident involving my wife in time for publication this week. So I will plan to write a second installment with the company’s response as soon as I receive it.

 

But for now, I must say that Greyhound, other bus companies, drivers unions (where they exist), and government regulators need to address this problem. In another transportation industry, so-called ridesharing, both Uber and Lyft—under pressure—have introduced “panic buttons” to their apps that connect passengers who feel in danger for any reason, including a driver’s actions, to local 911 services with a single touch. 

 

It seems like it’s past time for Greyhound and other bus companies to do something similar. Maybe some kind of panic button app that gives passengers a choice to either get in touch with a corporate office prepared to bring a problem driver to heel or contact local 911 depending on the severity of the situation.

 

Readers with opinions on this matter, or Greyhound or other bus company employees with information germaine to this discussion, should contact me at execeditor@digboston.com. Because this seems like a problem that needs all hands on deck until a workable solution is found. And my wife and her fellow passengers are hardly the first people to experience this problem. As a quick internet search of bus driver arrests for DUIs and the like—or avoidable accidents causing injuries and deaths—will inform even a casual researcher.

 

Apparent Horizon—recipient of 2018 and 2019 Association of Alternative Newsmedia Political Column Awards—is syndicated by the Boston Institute for Nonprofit Journalism. Jason Pramas is BINJ’s executive director, and executive editor and associate publisher of DigBoston. Copyright 2019 Jason Pramas. Licensed for use by the Boston Institute for Nonprofit Journalism and media outlets in its network.